Comparative Study of Recycling between Waste of Granules and Raw Thermoplastics (LDPE, HDPE and PET) Mixed with Sand for the Manufacture of Paving Stones in the City of Kinshasa in DRC

Alfa, Weya Mazinkene and Angel, Tabu Makusi and Lily, Akiabo Omari and Kalulu, Taba and Dieudonné, Musibono Eyul’Anki and Didas, Mpuru Mazembe and Haddy, Mbuyi Katshiatshia and Emmanuel, Biey Makaly (2023) Comparative Study of Recycling between Waste of Granules and Raw Thermoplastics (LDPE, HDPE and PET) Mixed with Sand for the Manufacture of Paving Stones in the City of Kinshasa in DRC. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology, 22 (4). pp. 85-94. ISSN 2456-690X

[thumbnail of Alfa2242023AJEE108078.pdf] Text
Alfa2242023AJEE108078.pdf - Published Version

Download (475kB)

Abstract

Objectives: The utilization of waste LDPE, HDPE, and PET, either in their raw or granulated forms, for manufacturing paving stones raises several challenges, including the production of weaker and less durable paving stones, increased atmospheric pollution, and material loss. This research aims to identify the most advantageous process for employing thermoplastic waste in paving stone production.

Research Design: The study is structured into five sections: introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.

Location and Duration: The study was conducted in the city of Kinshasa, and the experiments were carried out in July 2021.

Methodology: Raw and granulated thermoplastic waste (LDPE, HDPEE and PET) were respectively mixed with fine grained sand (] 0.063 – 0.2 mm [).The mixture was heated to obtain homogeneous paste. The later was poured into molds in order to manufacture the paving stones which were tested for resistance.

Results: On average, the ratio of thermoplastic granules to raw material yielded a recycling time of 17/22 minutes, producing 13/7 pavers. The weight loss of materials was 5.29±0.98/9.95±1.89 kg, and the strength was measured at 12.3±2.19/6.4±1.61 N/mm². The optimal material composition demonstrating the highest strength at 22.45 N/mm² comprised 30% LDPE and HDPE, 10% PET, and 60% sand.

Conclusion: Comparing raw thermoplastic waste with granulated thermoplastic waste, the latter proves more beneficial. Granulated thermoplastic waste yields more consolidated pavers, reduces weight loss of materials, shortens recycling time, minimizes smoke emission, and provides a superior average strength of pavers.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Open Research Librarians > Geological Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@open.researchlibrarians.com
Date Deposited: 07 Dec 2023 10:31
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2023 10:31
URI: http://stm.e4journal.com/id/eprint/2281

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item